Posted by dorayme on 12/19/43 11:35

In article <Xns97369E9D865A5jkorpelacstutfi@193.229.4.246>,
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:

> > I dispute most of the comments/replies that you have made here.
>
> The Usenet way of saying that your opponent is right is to quote him
> comprehensively and present no argument against any item.

There is no argument for this and it is not prima facie true.
Much more plausible is that the person who claims to dispute you
is either incapable of giving the arguments or can't be bothered.
I want that you should think about everything you say in 2006 and
be totally accurate. I don't want to see any more debating
points. Irrelevencies, yes. Lowly debating points, no.

[Back to original message]