Posted by dorayme on 01/22/06 03:22

In article <43d2d7f1$0$8277$cb0e7fc6@news.centralva.net>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:

> In my view this means even to
> > the point of putting quite (by monitor-view-standard) large pics
> > up, at least 800 or 900 pxs across. Why be a miserable frightened
> > rabbit with tiny pics?
> >
> > Jonathan, I know you do not specify "view res", so none of this
> > is a criticism of what you say.
>
> My rule of thumb <=400 pixels max on a side. Larger enough to be
> viewable but would not worth printing...

Fair enough. You are a likely a better artist than me, I would be
more flattered to be pinched, hence I can offer more pixels...

:)

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]