Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 09/04/05 14:35

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 10:53:42 GMT, Teh Czar ov All Teh Flonkers
<flonkerczar@popesnarky.gov> wrote:

>I was busily flonking away in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, when The
>Goddess Eris Herself suddenly made me reply to Ian Chesterton:
>> Lola, called Snarky, the Chocolate Snark
>>>
>>> I was busily flonking away in rec.arts.drwho, when The Goddess Eris
>>> Herself suddenly made me reply to Ian Chesterton:
>>>
>>> > I snipped this whole guy's argument when he started talking about the
>>> > Pentagon not being hit by a plane. Another liberal dork on quack.
>>>
>>> Based on what? I've seen photos of the immediate aftermath of 9/11 at the
>>> Pentagon -- no plane wreckage. No sign that the building had been struck
>>> by the wings of a 767, or a 747, or any kind of jet. Wreckage, yes, but
>>> more indicative of a bomb.
>>
>> Ok. So what happened to the people on flight 77? What about the
>> eyewitnesses who saw the jetliner fly over their heads towards the
>> Pentagon and then disappear in the explosion? You morons need to quit
>> listening to anti-American idiots on quack and start using some common
>> sense.
>
>What happened to the people on Flight 77? I don't know. That part's a
>mystery. They didn't crash into the Pentagon at a 42-degree angle, however.
>Eye-witnesses of *bank robberies* where they actually get a decent look at
>the robbers and /still/ manage to identify some innocent schmuck, never
>mind those who are mistaken about airplane crashes (and seeing a jet fly
>over, without *seeing* it crash, is evidence of nothing in any case),
>happens more often than you'd think.

*Hatter skims through yer .sig*

Hey um...just so you know:
www.google.com

I'm just sayin, it's not like you have to archive the whole of Usenet
in yer .sig.

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

[Back to original message]