|
|
Posted by subRoutinθ@s!0.0^7ii on 09/08/05 19:51
On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:51:05 -0700, in alt.flame Onideus Mad Hatter
<usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:
[...] Baby Matthew Takes a Dump in His Diapers
:
:BTW...why are you proud of the fact that you "*purchased*" a program?
:No offense, but yer the first person I've seen who was proud of his
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:inability to not know how to pirate software. To most people on my
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:level paying money for software is like paying money for CDs...it's
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:something only dumbasses who don't know any better do. Essentially
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:retards like you are fucked up the ass, straight through the wallet,
:so that people with technical expertise like myself can have the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:software for free. In other words, you paid out the nose so that a
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:good dozen or so people who are smarter than you could have the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:program for nothing...and you're celebrating that fact...which kinda
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:makes you even DUMBER than yer average idiot.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thank you for that admission, Mattie. My work here is complete. You see, my
point has been all along that no self-respecting corporation, be it Nintendo,
Disney, Nelvana, AGC, whatever, would ever hire let alone support someone who is
creating products, in this case websites, for them, if they knew that their
little worker-bee is using pirated copies of software programs from major
software companies to build their sites. It's considered a liability. Therefore
all you chest-thumping about the support you have from them is either one made
through deception or you simply have no support from any of them.
I hereby claim a
AHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHAH
HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHAHAH HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHAH
HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA HAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAH HAHA HAHAHAH HAHAHAHA HAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHA HAHA HAHA HAHAH
HAHAH HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHAH HAHA AHAH
HAHAH HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA AHAH HAHA AHAH AHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAH HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA AHAHA
AHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA AHAH HAHA HAHA HAH
_-
-_
subRoutine <http://www.softtargets.com>
Overunity Energy Mechanism
0,0,1
Ari Asikainen's SPANK: <http://tinyurl.com/bv4sx>
Snotty Campbawl's SPANK: <http://tinyurl.com/c78on>
"Avoid normal situations." <byend.removethisbityousillyperson@eskimo.com> wrote
in message news:db7j9i$c3e$1@eskinews.eskimo.com...
> In alt.flame Scott Campbell <thundering_puddles@msn.com> wrote:
>
[...] Jack the Sycophant hiding behind a killfile and offering commentary on
someone without having to read the person's mean words in return.
"Scott Campbell" <thundering_puddles@msn.com>
<d9ukmm$4m2$0@pita.alt.net>
"But is it as disgusting as a coward that hides behind a killfile in order
that he can offer commentary on someone without having to read
the person's mean words in return?
I'll just add this to your ever-growing list of gutless behavior."
[Back to original message]
|