Posted by bryan on 11/14/10 11:26

On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:23:58 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:07:03 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:01:03 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:42:37 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:19:51 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>still using that malformed sig that only works with agent, no0b?
>>>
>>> Oh so it works with Agent now, eh?
>>
>>er... i was mocking your claim that it only works with agent, matthew...
>>will it help if i put that in quotation marks?
>>
>>ahem. still using that malformed sig that "only works with agent", no0b?
>
> Uh oh, backpedal, LOOK OUT!

yeah! watch out, matthew... you nearly fell off!

now. back to the matter at hand.

here is _your_ statement - "It's formated perfectly...for Agent users"

do you still contend that your malformed sig works with forte agent?

> *snicker*
>
> --
>
> Odious Mud Splatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.bilgewater-productions.net

[Back to original message]