Posted by Fly Cooter on 12/25/35 11:26

In article <xn0e71oy11ttov000@kookology.info>, sean@petitmorte.net says...
>
>
>PJR wrote:
>
>> On 09 Sep 2005 20:42:48 GMT, Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote
>> in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>> > PJR wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 10:02:55 -0700, Onideus Mad Hatter
>> >> <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>> > >
>> >>> On 09 Sep 2005 16:39:58 GMT, "Sean Monaghan" <sean@petitmorte.net>
>> >>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> >>>> This gay-lame/mutual-netKKKopping 'war' has a certain foul stench
>> >> to it.
>> > > >
>> >>> ...*rechecks the thread*...
>> > > >
>> >>> Um, all of the AUK regs posting in response to Fly Poofter are
>> doing >>> exactly what I was doing with teh gay routine...so am I
>> correct in >>> assuming that you mean to nominate the WHOLE of AUK?
>> Or maybe you >>> need to bash yer fuckin head into the wall and
>> rethink this one.
>> > > >
>> >>> Further...what do you mean "mutual" netkopping? I never netkopped
>> >>> anything. I threatened to blow his lil Tripod smear off the face
>> of >>> the Inet, however that isn't netkopping, that's just being an
>> uber >>> evul fuckhead bastage. Netkopping is where you try and have
>> >>> something taken down, removed, silences, etc out of "genuine"
>> >>> reasons, not because you're doing it as a means of attacking a
>> >>> person. For example if Fly Poofter was trying to get the image
>> >>> taken down in order to "get back" at me, rather than doing it
>> >>> because he's on some righteous copyright infringement crusade.
>> >>> However retarded that endeavor is, it is a "genuine" reason.
>> > >
>> >> Your whining about your netkkkopping threats not really being
>> >> netkkkopping threats, because you'd enjoy being a netkkkop,
>> >> constitutes the lamest thing you've posted since your last
>> hilariously >> broken web page, Diapertard.
>> > >
>> >>>> I hereby nominate Onideus Mad Hatter and Fly Cooter, jointly, for
>> >> the >> Busted Urinal Award.
>> > > >
>> >>> I already have that one,
>> > >
>> >> Indeed you do, and quite a few others.
>> > >
>> >> Search Results
>> >> 6 matches for "moulton".
>> > >
>> >> Kook of the Month, December 2004 Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>> >> Golden Killfile, December 2004 Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>> >> Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, December 2004 Matthew
>> >> "Diaperboi" Moulton
>> >> Busted Urinal Award Matthew "Diaperboy" Moulton
>> >> Unabomber Surprise Matthew "Diaperboy" Moulton
>> >> Kook Kard Deck, Four of Clubs Matthew "Diaperboi" Moulton
>> > >
>> >>> Stupid...like 3 or 4 times now I think,
>> >
>> >> You can't win it more than once, Mathilda.
>> >
>> > I actually nominated the lame-war between Matthew and Flyboi.
>>
>> I noticed. I was commenting on Diaperboi's claim to have won the award
>> three or four times.
>>
>> I can't really comment on the nomination of the lame-war between him
>> and Fly Cooter, since I haven't bothered to read any of their lames
>> yet. However, I'm not keen on allowing Mr Blank-Web-Page a second BUA,
>> even if it's a joint one. He's not an interesting enough kook.
>>
>> > If you
>> > can't accept this nom, are there any other suitable awards for this
>> > pair? PAP, or Pickett, perhaps?
>>
>> PAP is open to anybody, and there are hardly any qualifications other
>> than being pathetic enough to be noticed in AUK. The Pickett is more
>> difficult to decide about. It has to involve an element of failed
>> crusading, and I can't see Diaperboi crusading at present.
>
>Good info - thanks.
>
>I hereby request a nomination morph, from the Busted Urinal Award, to
>the Pathetic Anal Pineapple Award, for Onideus Mad Hatter & Fly Cooter,
>jointly.
>
>Seconds, anyone?

I'd say give the award to TestiClees alone but he might be incarcerated
soon. Why waste an award on someone who can't accept it. And please just
leave me out of anything connected with his name. I don't want anything
to do with this fucking homo erectus. But thanks anyhow.

--
Fly Cooter
http://fly-cooter.tripod.com

[Back to original message]