|
|
Posted by bryan on 09/13/05 15:50
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:56:34 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:39:09 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:09:25 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter
>><usenet@bilgewater-productions.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:38:32 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:07:10 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter
>>>><usenet@bilgewater-productions.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:55:37 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:50:22 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:03:13 GMT, bryan
>>>>>>> <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:16:54 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:21:50 GMT, bryan
>>>>>>>>> <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:23:58 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:07:03 GMT, bryan
>>>>>>>>>>> <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:01:03 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:42:37 GMT, bryan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:19:51 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>still using that malformed sig that only works with agent,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>no0b?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh so it works with Agent now, eh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>er... i was mocking your claim that it only works with agent,
>>>>>>>>>>>>matthew... will it help if i put that in quotation marks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>ahem. still using that malformed sig that "only works with
>>>>>>>>>>>>agent", no0b?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Uh oh, backpedal, LOOK OUT!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>yeah! watch out, matthew... you nearly fell off!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>now. back to the matter at hand.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>here is _your_ statement - "It's formated perfectly...for Agent
>>>>>>>>>>users"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>do you still contend that your malformed sig works with forte
>>>>>>>>>>agent?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now that I got you to agree with it...of course. The goal was to
>>>>>>>>> get you to believe that it actually worked in Agent but didn't
>>>>>>>>> work in Free Agent...the goal was met, you believed it and thus
>>>>>>>>> at that point I pointed out that it does in fact NOT work in
>>>>>>>>> Agent. You were trolled.
>>>>>>>>> ^_^
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>translation:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>i was wrong and i've made up a story in a lame attempt to claw back
>>>>>>>>some dignity... it didn't work.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...of course, one has to wonder...does it REALLY not work like I
>>>>>>>>> originally said in Agent? He, he, he, he...oh I could fuck your
>>>>>>>>> lil head up for weeks on end, boy lemme tell ya. `, )
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>it won't work with any newsreader.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So now you're saying it won't work in ANY news reader, huh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>yup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you REALLY sure?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>yup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tell us that you're absolutely positive, Kiddo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>yup.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well...I hate to be the one to break it to ya, but I lied again! ^_^
>>>>>
>>>>>LOL, oh I never tire of this game.
>>>>>
>>>>>The deciding factor is not Agent nor Free Agent, but in fact the
>>>>>version numbers. Old versions of Agent and Free Agent (anything
>>>>>before 2.0) and the .sig will be removed perfectly.
>>>>
>>>>i don't believe you.
>>>>
>>>>> Would you like to deny it?
>>>>
>>>>yes.
>>>>
>>>>>Go on, you know you want to.
>>>>
>>>>i just did.
>>>>
>>>>>Openly defy me right now,
>>>>
>>>>ok.
>>>>
>>>>>make the claim once again,
>>>>
>>>>rightio.
>>>>
>>>>>tell everyone that it doesn't work right in ANY version of Agent.
>>>>
>>>>ahem... you're malformed .sig will not work in _any_ version of forte
>>>>agent, even those below version 2.0.
>>>
>>>WRONG!
>>
>><SLAP>
>>
>>>http://groups.google.com/group/uk.telecom/msg/a8ff8d0bcc1f8cfe
>>>
>>>"Agent has handled OE "malformed" .sig separators for some time"
>>
>>scrape that barrel, matthew!
>>
>>irrelevant. the malformed .sig from outlook has nothing to do with your
>>.sig... 5 out of 10 for failed diversion.
>>
>>a proper .sig seperator is -- (hyphen, hyphen, space).
>>
>>outlook strips the space from the .sig seperator such that when people
>>reply to outlook users posts, the .sig isn't stripped.
>>
>>_your_ malformed .sig is -- (space, hyphen, hyphen) and it will not work
>>in _any_ newsreader, including agent or free agent of any version.
>
> Post proof, Bryan...
i've shown that your malformed .sig will not work in agent 3.0, free
agent 2.0 and agent 1.93.
what more do you want, matthew?
> or are you just pulling shit out of your ass?
what? do you mean like:
"It's formated perfectly...for Agent users."
"I entered my own .sig and delimiter, I have no idea what Agent uses for
its default."
"Possibly others, Agent is the only one that I know for sure that'll do it."
"It is in the sense that for Agent users it'll cut out when replying."
"You're not using Agent, Dumbass. You're using FREE Agent..."
"The deciding factor is not Agent nor Free Agent, but in fact the
version numbers. Old versions of Agent and Free Agent (anything
before 2.0) and the .sig will be removed perfectly."
"net legend".
> I posted proof...why can't you? ^_^
you posted "proof" that agent can handle outlook express's malformed .sig,
matthew... i have yet to test this and when i prove you wrong yet again,
you will undoubtedly say "it was all a troll!"
you have not posted proof that "Old versions of Agent and Free Agent
(anything before 2.0)" will remove your .sig "perfectly".
> --
>
> Odious Mud Splatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.bilgewater-productions.net
[Back to original message]
|