Posted by IWP506 on 09/18/05 19:14

LOL

Neredbojias wrote:
> With neither quill nor qualm, Tobias Stein quothed:
>
> > > http://validator.w3.org/docs/help.html#icon
> >
> > Thanks:
> >
> > -----------
> > "Web content providers are granted the right to use the "W3C valid" logo
> > on pages that pass validation (through the use of the W3C Markup
> > Validator) for the W3C technology represented by the icon, and only on
> > pages that pass validation..."
> >
> > ------------
> >
> > and
> >
> > ---------------------
> >
> > I saw the "valid" icon displayed on a site but the page is invalid. What
> > should I do?
>
> My index page used to validate, but apparently the w3c made some changes
> in its validator to alter that condition to my detriment. Anyway, I had
> to make some adjustments and when I did, there became available to me
> some new validation images which actually took into account various
> alpha inconsistencies, one of which caused my own problem. In a spirit
> of bonhomie, I've affixed the image pair to the bottom of my site's home
> page at:
>
> http://www.neredbojias.com/
>
> ...where you may download them at your leisure.
>
> >
> > We recommend that you write to the site manager and politely bring to
> > that person's attention that there is an inconsistency. Please note that
> > W3C does not verify or attempt to enforce validity claims.
> >
> > ---------------------
> >
> > All my questions are answered, thanks a lot...
> >
> > By the way: i don´t use this logo, but i could on some pages ;-)
> >
> > Greetz
> >
>
> --
> Neredbojias
> Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]