Posted by bryan on 09/20/05 13:05

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 02:26:17 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:39:25 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.net>
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:06:44 -0700, Odious Mud Splatter wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:50:15 GMT, bryan <bryan@rimmer.red-dwarf.lan>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Post proof, Bryan...
>>>
>>>>i've shown that your malformed .sig will not work in agent 3.0, free
>>>>agent 2.0 and agent 1.93.
>>>
>>> ...actually...you haven't shown ANY of that.
>>
>>yes i have. i've replied to your posts with free agent 2.0, agent 3.0 and
>>agent 1.93 and they've all left your malformed .sig in.
>
> ...wow, apparently it's just raining stupid and you forgot your
> umbrella. Here's a...random thought for ya...what if you just copied
> and pasted the .sig in after the fact?

but that would make me as dishonest as you, matthew.

here's another thought... what if you reply to one of your own posts? does
it leave your malformed .sig in? and another thought... what if you change
your malformed .sig to what it's supposed to be? does it get removed?

> See, it's the whole "proof" deal I think yer havin trouble
> comprehending.

uh huh. would you like to tell everyone again that outlook's
malformed .sig proves your point, "net legend"?

>>> I mean, you haven't ACTUALLY provided ANY proof other than just you
>>> runnin at the fuckin mouth.
>
>>there's only one person here running at the mouth... do you remember
>>spouting drivel like this?
>>
>>"It's formated perfectly...for Agent users."
>>
>>"I entered my own .sig and delimiter, I have no idea what Agent uses for
>>its default."
>>
>>"Possibly others, Agent is the only one that I know for sure that'll do
>>it."
>>
>>"It is in the sense that for Agent users it'll cut out when replying."
>>
>>"You're not using Agent, Dumbass. You're using FREE Agent..."
>>
>>"The deciding factor is not Agent nor Free Agent, but in fact the
>>version numbers. Old versions of Agent and Free Agent (anything before
>>2.0) and the .sig will be removed perfectly."
>>
>>"net legend".
>
> My, my, somebody sure is a fan boi. Are you archiving ALL my posts or
> just the parts you like to jack off too, wannabe Poofter.

google archives your drivel, matthew.

>>> *shrugs* Reality sure must be a bitch
>
>>it's not me who's whining like one, matthew... i've proven you a no0b
>>or a liar and spnaked you. be a man and admit you were wrong.
>
> Hard to be wrong when I was never trying to be right in the first
> place. You're fighting against yourself, Retard, you just can't see
> it...it's the whole "stupidity" thing ya got goin for ya. ^_^

yeah, yeah... you're sure fooling everybody with that whole "it was only a
troll" routine.

> -- <---- malformed .sig
>
> Odious Mud Splatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.bilgewater-productions.net

[Back to original message]