Posted by rf on 09/22/05 02:36

Luigi Donatello Asero

> The thread is adressed to everyone who wants to answer.

And everybody has addressed your problem.

Your initial error, the one that I pointed out, occurred because you use IE
to text your work. IE is *broken* and ignored your error. FF is not broken
and acted upon your error, giving you results at variance to your
expectations.

If you had use FF to test your work first then this discussion would not be
taking place. You would never have published the site, nor asked for a
critique here, if you had just once viewed the page with FF. For &deity's
sake man the error stood out like dogs balls!

The *real* problem is that, despite everybody, and yes, I mean everybody,
telling you to use FF or some other non-IE browser to test with as you
write, you continue to dismiiss this advice with disclaimers such as "I
think" and "more people us IE".

You asked for advice. You were given it. If you don't heed that advice then
that is your fault, and your real problem.

I felt justified in pointing out your coding errors this time and naturally
the discussion moved on to your inadequate testing practices, which should
be corrected.

The next time you have a problem with something not working in FF when you
have clearly only tested with IE then I for one will not be wasting my time
in commenting.

Cheers
Richard.

[Back to original message]