Posted by Peter Parsnip on 09/28/05 11:16

Be still! and revere Jack Gillen, who blessed us with their presence on
28 Sep 2005...

> "Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
> news:270920052119494462%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:48:30 GMT, Little Meow <meow@meow.meow> got
>>>double secret probation because:
>>>
>>>>Art Deco wrote in news:270920052041105332%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>>>>
>>>>> Terrence Cooter <fly_cooter_@example.localhost> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <250920051813174571%art_deco@127.0.0.1>,
>>>>>>art_deco@127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 25 Sep 2005 16:12:39 GMT, Sean Monaghan
>>>>>>>>> <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:44:15 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
>>>>>>>>> >> <nospam@fuck-off-and-die.com> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> >>> And given all the netKKKops
>>>>>>>>> >>> around lately, is it worth considering setting up a
>>>>>>>>> >>> "Terrence Cooter Memorial LOOK! UP IN THE SKY! IT'S A BIRD!
>>>>>>>>> >>> IT'S A PLANE! IT'S SUPER NETKKKOP!"-type award?
>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>> >> AFA-B has an award for netkkkops. In AUK, netkkkopping is
>>>>>>>>> >> filed
>>>>>>>>> under >> "general lameness", which has already earned him a BUA
>>>>>>>>> nomination, a >> PAP nomination, a CotM nomination, and
>>>>>>>>> possibly others that I haven't >> caught up with yet.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Gerald Newton needs an opponent for this fine award [TS]. I
>>>>>>>>> > hereby nominate Fly Cooter for the Tinfoil Star award for
>>>>>>>>> > netKKKops. Flyboi is probably the most aggressive netKKKop
>>>>>>>>> > I've witnessed in real time. Phoning domain registrants, to
>>>>>>>>> > see if their whois data is valid? Faxing web hosting
>>>>>>>>> > companies in the name of his parents?
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Seconds, anyone?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A technical question: Do nominees for AFA-B awards have to have
>>>>>>>>> posted to AFA-B or not? I'd argue that the AFA-B awards ought
>>>>>>>>> to be limited to AFA-B posters. Otherwise they're merely
>>>>>>>>> supplementary AUK
>>>>>>>>> awards.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Good question; this has been discussed before. With the possible
>>>>>>>>exception of the Tinfoil Star (and I would argue for the
>>>>>>>>Chernobyl Prize, too), Bookman would like us to get the
>>>>>>>>prospective nominee to post evidence to AFA-B if he/she/it isn't
>>>>>>>>already posting there. All of my nominees have met this
>>>>>>>>requirement - including Poofter, who is up for one award and one
>>>>>>>>office. The only nominee I had to bait over to AFA-B is George
>>>>>>>>Hammond for the Angstrom. I need to make all of this clear in
>>>>>>>>the FAQ.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Fly's spews have been showing up in AFA-B almost from the start.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>Are you still making cascades?
>Are you still making cascades?
Are you still making cascades?

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

[Back to original message]