Posted by Peter Parsnip on 09/28/05 19:57

Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence on 28
Sep 2005...

> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC), peterparsnip@gmail.com
>>(Peter Parsnip) transparently proposed:
>>
>>>Be still! and revere Aratzio, who blessed us with their presence on 28
>>>Sep 2005...
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:16:23 +0000 (UTC), peterparsnip@gmail.com
>>>> (Peter Parsnip) transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>Be still! and revere Jack Gillen, who blessed us with their presence
>>>>>on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:270920052119494462%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
>>>>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:48:30 GMT, Little Meow <meow@meow.meow>
>>>>>>>>got double secret probation because:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Art Deco wrote in news:270920052041105332%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Terrence Cooter <fly_cooter_@example.localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>In article <250920051813174571%art_deco@127.0.0.1>,
>>>>>>>>>>>art_deco@127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Sep 2005 16:12:39 GMT, Sean Monaghan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:44:15 +0545, Kadaitcha Man
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> <nospam@fuck-off-and-die.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> And given all the netKKKops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> around lately, is it worth considering setting up a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> "Terrence Cooter Memorial LOOK! UP IN THE SKY! IT'S A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> BIRD! IT'S A PLANE! IT'S SUPER NETKKKOP!"-type award?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> AFA-B has an award for netkkkops. In AUK, netkkkopping
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> is filed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under >> "general lameness", which has already earned him
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a BUA nomination, a >> PAP nomination, a CotM nomination,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and possibly others that I haven't >> caught up with yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Gerald Newton needs an opponent for this fine award
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [TS]. I hereby nominate Fly Cooter for the Tinfoil Star
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > award for netKKKops. Flyboi is probably the most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > aggressive netKKKop I've witnessed in real time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Phoning domain registrants, to see if their whois data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > is valid? Faxing web hosting companies in the name of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > his parents?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Seconds, anyone?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A technical question: Do nominees for AFA-B awards have to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have posted to AFA-B or not? I'd argue that the AFA-B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awards ought to be limited to AFA-B posters. Otherwise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're merely supplementary AUK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Good question; this has been discussed before. With the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>possible exception of the Tinfoil Star (and I would argue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>for the Chernobyl Prize, too), Bookman would like us to get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the prospective nominee to post evidence to AFA-B if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>he/she/it isn't already posting there. All of my nominees
>>>>>>>>>>>>>have met this requirement - including Poofter, who is up for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>one award and one office. The only nominee I had to bait
>>>>>>>>>>>>>over to AFA-B is George Hammond for the Angstrom. I need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>make all of this clear in the FAQ.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Fly's spews have been showing up in AFA-B almost from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>start.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>>Are you still making cascades?
>>Are you still making cascades?
>Are you still making cascades?
Are you still making cascades?


--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

[Back to original message]