Posted by Peter Parsnip on 09/29/05 22:00

Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence on 29
Sep 2005...

> Flaagg <none@here.now> wrote:
>
>> In article <dhgtak$ije$1@pookiehead.databasix.com>, Peter Parsnip
>> <peterparsnip@gmail.com> writes...
>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence on
>>> 29 Sep 2005...
>>>> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence
>>>>> on 29 Sep 2005...
>>>>>> Flaagg <none@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <280920052106290588%art_deco@127.0.0.1>, Art Deco
>>>>>>> <art_deco@ 127.0.0.1> writes...
>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland <steveREMOVEDOTINVALIDTOREPLY@meow.org.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello Flaagg, Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can
>>>>>>>>> hear me. Is there anyone at home?
>>>>>>>>>> In article <tFH_e.7287$WT3.447@trnddc03>, ah
>>>>>>>>>> <splifingate@gmail.com> writes...
>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) transparently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Aratzio, who blessed us with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:16:23 +0000 (UTC),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) transparently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Jack Gillen, who blessed us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with their presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:270920052119494462%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:48:30 GMT, Little Meow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <meow@meow.meow> got double secret probation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:270920052041105332%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Terrence Cooter <fly_cooter_@example.localhost>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <250920051813174571%art_deco@127.0.0.1>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> art_deco@127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Sep 2005 16:12:39 GMT, Sean Monaghan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:44:15 +0545,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam@fuck-off-and-die.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And given all the netKKKops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around lately, is it worth considering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting up a "Terrence Cooter Memorial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOOK! UP IN THE SKY! IT'S A BIRD! IT'S A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PLANE! IT'S SUPER NETKKKOP!"-type award?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFA-B has an award for netkkkops. In AUK,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netkkkopping is filed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under >> "general lameness", which has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already earned him a BUA nomination, a >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PAP nomination, a CotM nomination, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly others that I haven't >> caught up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerald Newton needs an opponent for this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine award [TS]. I hereby nominate Fly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooter for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Tinfoil Star award for netKKKops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flyboi is probably the most aggressive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netKKKop I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witnessed in real time. Phoning domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registrants, to see if their whois data is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid? Faxing web hosting companies in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> name of his parents?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seconds, anyone?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A technical question: Do nominees for AFA-B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> awards have to have posted to AFA-B or not?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd argue that the AFA-B awards ought to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limited to AFA-B posters. Otherwise they're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merely supplementary AUK awards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question; this has been discussed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before. With the possible exception of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tinfoil Star (and I would argue for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chernobyl Prize,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too), Bookman would like us to get the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospective nominee to post evidence to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFA-B if he/she/it isn't already posting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there. All of my nominees have met this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirement - including Poofter, who is up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for one award and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one office. The only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominee I had to bait over to AFA-B is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> George Hammond for the Angstrom. I need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make all of this clear in the FAQ.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fly's spews have been showing up in AFA-B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost from the start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>> Are you still making cascades?
>> Are you still making cascades?
> Are you still making cascades?
Are you still making cascades?

--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.

[Back to original message]