|
Posted by Neredbojias on 09/29/05 23:56
With neither quill nor qualm, Aratzio quothed:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:45:41 -0700, Neredbojias
> <neredbojias@neredbojias.com> got double secret probation because:
>
> >With neither quill nor qualm, Aratzio quothed:
> >
> >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:45:07 -0700, Neredbojias
> >> <neredbojias@neredbojias.com> transparently proposed:
> >>
> >> >With neither quill nor qualm, Aratzio quothed:
> >> >
> >> >> >Ooo, third grade cryptography. How, uh, clever.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Anyway, you are what you are. Thank God I'm not.
> >>
> >> Did you happen to note that you called me clever then claimed you were
> >> not?
> >
> >Did you happen to realize that if you were a computer, your processing
> >speed would be in the nanohertz range.
>
> Why not pico or femto? Would that you could actually make an analogy
> that was relevant.
Ooo, ooo, what a scintillating comeback. <yawn>
> >> It is good to see that you have such a firm grasp of your own
> >> limitations and that you are unafraid to display your limitations for
> >> others to enjoy.
> >
> >It is good to see that you can see anything at all.
>
> Nice, a non sequitur.
Ah, the expression favored by the idiot when he doesn't know what else
to say...
> >> >> Ooo, clueless wankstain, it is called an *acronym*.
> >> >
> >> >Yes, I know.
> >>
> >> No you did not:
> >> "Ooo, third grade cryptography."
> >> Trust me, cryptography is not the same as acronym.
> >
> >The funny thing is, your ersatz cleverness is even dumber than your dumb
> >act.
>
> And yet you are the one trying to portray me as clever. So which is
> it?
I thought we went over this already. You made the same false assertion,
I refuted it, and you proffered some lame, whinny rebuttal in return.
Although this may be your typical modus operandi, you should really try
to do better when you venture out into the real world.
> >> >But you have to admit it's pretty juvenile, not
> >> >particularly clever, and boring to most people who can read.
> >>
> >> So you feel that you can speak for the majority of usenet poasters,
> >> most of whom would know the common acronym IKYABWAI. Which is
> >> something upon which you may wish to cogitate.
> >
> >You really shouldn't use words like "cogitate" when you can't spell
> >words like "posters". As for the question behind your "question", do
> >you "really feel" that most people find your inane conversations
> >interesting?
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Nice laugh. It fits my image of you.
> Results 1 - 10 of 45,100 for (poast OR poaster OR poasts). (0.26
> seconds)
How enlightening. I wonder what the results would be for "shit"?
> Your ignorance of usenet jargon continues to shine like a quasar.
My 'ignorance...shines'? Pretty paltry, gal. Your ignorance of the use
and meanings of words continues to suck like a black hole.
> Wanna go up agin meuns in won uf dem chicken scratchin tingies?
>
> Must be difficult in your world to be such a gormless twat.
Ha ha, IKYABWAI? (Sorry 'bout that, but when communicating on a lower
level...)
> >> If you do not happen to know what an acronym means there are two
> >> simple and easy things to do. One would be a google search. Since
> >> IKYABWAI is such a common acronym it might be difficult to wade
> >> through the hits. The other would have been to say "WTF is IKYABWAI"
> >> or something of that ilk (YAY, I used ILK!).
> >
> >First you say I didn't know, now it's "if". Schizophrenia or short-term
> >memory deficiency?
>
> *snicker*
> Try reading what was written, muttonhead. "If you do not happen to
> know what an acronym means". Note the OBVIOUS non specificity of that
> statement. What followed would be the specific example of your
> ignorance.
Ah yes, selective referencing to support a fallacious argument. Is your
ignorance deliberate or do you actually suffer from chronic reduced
mental faculties?
> Secondly, cupcake:
>
> Schizophrenia:
>
> Medical Dictionary
>
> Definition: The most common form of psychosis, characterized by
> partial or total withdrawal of interest in the world outside of
> oneself and loss of intellectual and emotional function.
>
> Biology Dictionary
>
> Definition: Schizophrenia is the name for any of a group of mental
> disorders characterized by abnormal thought, mood and behavior.
>
> For example:
> thought: misinterpretation of reality, frequently inclined towards
> self-protection from perceived harm
> mood: inappropriate emotional response, lack of empathy with others
> behavior: withdrawn, regressive, and bizarre
>
> Do at least have a fucking clue as to the meaning of the word you are
> using.
Well, pardon my English, but I think it describes you pretty well. -At
least from what I've witnessed so far. Furthermore, my opinion is not
in the least attenuated by the fact that you actually looked up the word
in more than one reference and cited the definitions while apparently
failing to grasp the very meanings you are attempting to employ on your
behalf.
> >> But you chose the more entertaining third method, from my view, the
> >> stand upon the hill and scream out "I AM CLUELESS, PLEASE MAKE FUN OF
> >> ME" method.
> >>
> >> >Why do you post such things to inappropriate newsgroups, anyway?
> >
> >Uh huh, sure, those 2 sentences are equivalent all right...
>
> Poast edits, cupcake? Now why would you wish to place to disparate
> statements together and attempt to connect them?
Uh, sexual exuberance?
> >> Your ability to display your ignorance appears infinite. So, cupcake,
> >> do tell me what is your definition of "inappropriate groups" and how
> >> you came to be poasting to all of the froups froups in teh froups
> >> line.
> >
> >Are you answering a question with a question or do you just like to hear
> >yourself say "froup"?
>
> I wrote words on a screen, cupcake. Hearing would have required
> speaking.
While you are technically correct, the nature of your silent writings is
strongly suggestive of redundant mumbling.
> I am sure in your ignorant corner of your personal utopian
> society everyone must sound out each and every word. In my more
> educated and obviously more worldly existence reading is done silently
> unless one is requested to read aloud.
Okay, that's reasonable. Finally.
> Contrary to your punctuation lamery, it was obviously a question and
> you seemed to have avoided answering the requested clarification of
> your terminology.
Hmm, attractive verbiage but still no substance. Still, an improvement.
> >> Extrapolate from there as to how I came to be poasting to the
> >> same four froups.
> >
> >I know your proclivities. The subject is why are you posting such crap
> >here.
>
> Umm, cupcake, the fact I responded to your poast in AUK has not quite
> sunk in yet has it?
Your response was noted but not accepted. It suggested only that you
were either too lazy or too stupid to sever inappropriate newsgroups
from your replies. -Which I already knew.
> >> Then once you have spent several hours working your
> >> way through the thread, ask yourself, "Pills or gun?" because frankly
> >> you may be too stupid to actually live.
> >
> >Yet another pre-teen comment from someone who probably could do better
> >if he tried. Well froup on, froup ranger, but froup somewhere else
> >because this group isn't a froup-group and the *normal* participants
> >aren't fruit loops.
>
> The alliteration was pathetic.
Au contrare, mon twit, it was good. 'Course I wouldn't really expect
you to appreciate it.
> So you are the crowning achievement of alt.html. The top dog. Poseur
> deluxe.
Oh, no, not at all. We have a guy here named Luigi who would really
kick your ass were he so-inclined. However, in an ocean full of sharks,
he usually leaves the sardines to his mendicants.
> What a parodoy of humanity you simpletons must be.
Nice sentence, doof. Yeah, (we're) a real "parodoy" all right...
> Paradoxically you come upon the greater usenet assuming that you are
> in some way wise in the ways and byways. Yet when your ignorance is
> pointed out, by those that are much wiser, you revel in your ignorance
> and wear it like armor to protecy you from such scurrilous attacks
> that your ignorance will bring.
Believe it or not, I liked that paragraph. Oh, it could have been
better but so can most things and it was something more than just an
automatic relaxant.
> One other little, minor display of just how ignorant you are:
> Results 1 - 10 of 188,000 for (froup OR froups). (0.46 seconds)
So - there are hundreds of thousands of froup-savvy people in the world.
Well that's just marvelous. Maybe I'll go home tonight and look the
word up in my dictionary so I can post the findings tomorrow and make a
fool of myself, too.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
[Back to original message]
|