|
|
Posted by Peter Parsnip on 09/30/05 01:46
Be still! and revere Phillip Kyle, who blessed us with their presence on
29 Sep 2005...
> Art Deco <art_deco@127.0.0.1> verbally sodomised in
> news:290920051420415815%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>
>> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence on
>>>29 Sep 2005...
>>>
>>>> Flaagg <none@here.now> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <dhgtak$ije$1@pookiehead.databasix.com>, Peter Parsnip
>>>>> <peterparsnip@gmail.com> writes...
>>>>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their presence
>>>>>> on 29 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their
>>>>>>>> presence on 29 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>> Flaagg <none@here.now> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <280920052106290588%art_deco@127.0.0.1>, Art Deco
>>>>>>>>>> <art_deco@ 127.0.0.1> writes...
>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland <steveREMOVEDOTINVALIDTOREPLY@meow.org.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Flaagg, Is there anybody in there? Just nod if you can
>>>>>>>>>>>> hear me. Is there anyone at home?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <tFH_e.7287$WT3.447@trnddc03>, ah
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <splifingate@gmail.com> writes...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Parsnip <peterparsnip@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Art Deco, who blessed us with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:40:26 +0000 (UTC),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip) transparently
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proposed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Aratzio, who blessed us with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:16:23 +0000 (UTC),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> peterparsnip@gmail.com (Peter Parsnip)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still! and revere Jack Gillen, who blessed us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with their presence on 28 Sep 2005...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Art Deco" <art_deco@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:270920052119494462%art_deco@127.0.0.1...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 02:48:30 GMT, Little Meow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <meow@meow.meow> got double secret probation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:270920052041105332%art_deco@127.0.0.1:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Terrence Cooter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <fly_cooter_@example.localhost>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <250920051813174571%art_deco@127.0.0.1>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> art_deco@127.0.0.1 says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sean Monaghan <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Sep 2005 16:12:39 GMT, Sean
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Monaghan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sean@petitmorte.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PJR wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 16:44:15 +0545,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Man
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nospam@fuck-off-and-die.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And given all the netKKKops
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around lately, is it worth
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>considering
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting up a "Terrence Cooter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Memorial
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOOK! UP IN THE SKY! IT'S A BIRD!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IT'S >A >> PLANE! IT'S SUPER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>NETKKKOP!"-type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>award? >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFA-B has an award for netkkkops. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AUK, > netkkkopping is filed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> under >> "general lameness", which has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already earned him a BUA nomination, a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PAP nomination, a CotM nomination,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and possibly others that I haven't >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>caught up with yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gerald Newton needs an opponent for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>this > fine award [TS]. I hereby
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nominate Fly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cooter for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Tinfoil Star award for netKKKops.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flyboi is probably the most aggressive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> netKKKop I've
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> witnessed in real time. Phoning domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> registrants, to see if their whois data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>is valid? Faxing web hosting companies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>in >the name of his parents?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seconds, anyone?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A technical question: Do nominees for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFA-B awards have to have posted to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>AFA-B or not? I'd argue that the AFA-B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>awards ought to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> limited to AFA-B posters. Otherwise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're merely supplementary AUK awards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good question; this has been discussed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before. With the possible exception of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Tinfoil Star (and I would argue for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Chernobyl Prize,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too), Bookman would like us to get the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prospective nominee to post evidence to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AFA-B if he/she/it isn't already posting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there. All of my nominees have met this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requirement - including Poofter, who is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up for one award and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one office. The only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nominee I had to bait over to AFA-B is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> George Hammond for the Angstrom. I need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to make all of this clear in the FAQ.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fly's spews have been showing up in AFA-B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> almost from the start.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>>> Are you still making cascades?
>>> Are you still making cascades?
>> Are you still making cascades?
> Are you still making cascades?
Are you still making cascades?
--
1> Peter Parsnip
2> Compliance
3> Further compliance
4> At the limit of compliance
5> Non-compliant. As always.
[Back to original message]
|