Posted by Neredbojias on 01/12/84 11:28

With neither quill nor qualm, Jemdam.com quothed:

>
> "Neredbojias" <neredbojias@neredbojias.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1dae00f2a68313cb9898ea@news.intergate.com...
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Jemdam.com quothed:
> >
> >> I welcome other webmasters views, but only comment if you are a big (ish)
> >> player, i.e. Alexa rating below 250000 as you just don't have enough
> >> traffic
> >> to know the effect of links vs google.
> >
> > Hey, Alexa rated me number 1 (-until I dumped her for Felicia.)
> > Nevertheless, she still doesn't deny I'm a big(ish) player.
> >
> Okay thanks for all the replies based on insults and talking around the
> subject but the question still remains:
> Does any 'big player' or 'small player' get more hits from search engines
> than link exchanges?
> Now, before you all start again talking around the subject let's have some
> facts. Tell us all:
>
> Domain: Monthly Unique : Percentage search engines : Percentage Other
>
> I will start:
>
> http://www.pubtricks.com : 10000 : 30% : 70%

I don't know, but the thought comes to mind that what if a "player"
doesn't have any link exchanges?

I'll say this much about it: I think search engines are overrated and
I'd much rather have a good link-exchange network if I were concerned
about traffic.

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]