Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 10/12/58 11:28

|-|erc wrote:

> Here's your problem
>
> w3
> Deprecated
> A deprecated element or attribute is one that has been outdated by newer constructs. Deprecated elements are defined in the
> reference manual in appropriate locations, but are clearly marked as deprecated. Deprecated elements may become obsolete in future
> versions of HTML.
>
> Answers
> deprecate
> To make invalid or obsolete by removing or flagging the item. When commands or statements in a language are planned for deletion in
> future releases of the compiler or rendering engine, they are said to be deprecated. Programmers should begin to remove them from
> the source code in subsequent revisions of their programs
>
>
> Any HTML that a class can achieve is by definition redundant, so by definition it MAY become obselete
> (as its function is doubled up)
>
> So because w3 want attention, they call 'redundant' 'deprecated' as if they control HTML, but their definition
> of deprecated is weak, all they say is it MAY become obsolete, meaning its redundant. The real meaning
> is it WILL become obselete.
>
> So all you nitwits are reading about redundant code going..... its deprecated!
>
> Of course, considering style sheets are just a secondary system, redundancy is fine and so are the original HTML tags.
>
> style="margins:0" is also redundant, but its not deprecated simply because its the new way to do it.
> "been outdated by newer constructs"
>
> Herc
>
>
>

Yeah, oooooookay... <backs away slowly for he may be accompanied by
rabbit monkeys armed with nuclear bananas>

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

[Back to original message]