Posted by Neredbojias on 10/06/05 18:26

With neither quill nor qualm, |-|erc quothed:

> : > he said height, not <tr height>. and if you claim height is deprecated cite something,
> : > because I've never heard such a total figment of anyones imagination like yours. maybe its a tumor?
> :
> : *Height is deprecated.*
> :
> : "Twinkle, twinkle, little star.
> : How I wonder where you are.
> : Only deprecated high,
> : So you'll fall down by-the-by."
> :
>
> No its not, w3 are clearly twisting the meaining of deprecated.
> It will never be obselete and w3 does not actually state it will become obselete.

Hey, I don't think the w3c is always rational, either. But what's so
traumatic about using css instead of html? It seems to me that css is
more versatile if a little clunky, and it does more as far as stylizing
goes.

Anyway, you said:

> > Are you all involved in some movement to change HTML or something, forcing people
> > to use style sheets?

....and that is correct. The movement is one to standardize markup for
all browsers and most everybody is behind it.

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]