Posted by Neredbojias on 10/06/05 18:33

With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:

>
> "Neredbojias" <neredbojias@neredbojias.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:MPG.1dae5320cc6d4be39898f3@news.intergate.com...
> > With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:
> >
> > >
> > > "Neredbojias" <neredbojias@neredbojias.com> skrev i meddelandet
> > > news:MPG.1dae1047ee0d3d099898f1@news.intergate.com...
> > > > With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:
> > > [cut]
> > > > Well of course. Communism is the ultimate "social state", is it not?
> > > > From one particular point of view, communism vs. democracy is the
> range
> > > > of values between security vs. independence. While I agree that some
> > > > social "security" is beneficial, which would you rather have as a
> > > > priority?
> > >
> > > That is a very difficult question.
> > > Generally speaking I would say that
> > > it depends on the social context.
> > > In a society where people are very poor, it would probably be more
> > > important to let them eat than be independent.
> >
> > That's a point many people often confuse. An independent people is
> > capable of feeding itself in a free land.
>
>
> What about colonialism?
> What about the opium war?
> Did it not affect China?

Probably. Did Hitler affect Italy? Does he affect it now?

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]