Posted by Matt Probert on 10/06/05 22:02

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 08:26:15 -0700, Neredbojias
<neredbojias@neredbojias.com> wrote:

> Hey, I don't think the w3c is always rational, either. But what's so
> traumatic about using css instead of html? It seems to me that css is
> more versatile if a little clunky, and it does more as far as stylizing
> goes.

CSS instead of HTML ? You mean separate CSS styles rather than
embedding the styles inline into the HTML, surely?

Matt

--
The Probert Encyclopaedia - Beyond Britannica
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com

[Back to original message]