Posted by Neredbojias on 01/14/42 11:29
With neither quill nor qualm, hywel.jenkins@gmail.com quothed:
>
> rf wrote:
> > Alan Searle wrote:
> >
> > > Any tips on this issue would be gratefully received.
> >
> > Others have commented on the frames. I would like to comment on the images.
> > While nice they are *Way* too large. Most of them come in at 250K plus. The
> > top image, containing simply "outdoor space design" and a sort of
> > background is a massive 300K.
> >
> > These images should be 20K maximum. For the top image, 2K of background and
> > *text* on top of that for the words.
> >
>
> Should add that these images don't just need compressing - they need
> resizing in a graphics' application. Those that I looked at are 600
> pixels across, HTMLised into 30 pixels. Why do people do that?
Penis largesse envy?
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
[Back to original message]
|