|
Posted by Travis Newbury on 10/19/05 11:40
"TJ" <noemail@none.invalid> said:
>> Had that contract let you go you would have won because you did
>> what you believed was right. I do the same.
> Then you're as big a fool as the OP.
How so? Because I would tell the client that I though "something"
was dumb, but when he disagreed with me I go ahead and do it for
them? How is that dumb?
> You're asking me to believe that you'd deliberately throw away
> money over "web-morals" = nothing?
No, read what I said. You have to both READ and UNDERSTAND what
you read or your reply makes you sound really stupid.
> What the hell? If you're not trolling this group is more f-ed
> up than I thought.
Bummer you think that way. Well it was good knowing you, have a
safe trip...
> Y'all just keep making sure your sites are drab, dull, W3C
> compliant, and boring.
You really should lurk a while so you understand the personalities
here. I am probably the biggest proponent for Flash and non-dull
sites. Which can only make me believe that it is you that is
trolling...
> Meanwhile? I'll keep giving my clients all the purple,
> spinny-things they want, snatch tips from this group, and
> continue taking $ out of your collective pockets.
1. Read the post.
2. Understand what you read.
3. Make your reply.
(You seemed to have missed step 2)
> Sheesh! For folks that are so obviously *very* intelligent,
> most of ya sure are stupid in your own special ways.
Are we now?
--
-=tn=-
[Back to original message]
|