Posted by dorayme on 10/20/05 00:31

> From: Travis Newbury <travisenwbury@hotmail.com>
>
> "TJ" <noemail@none.invalid> said:
>>> Had that contract let you go you would have won because you did
>>> what you believed was right. I do the same.
>> Then you're as big a fool as the OP.
>
> How so? Because I would tell the client that I though "something"
> was dumb, but when he disagreed with me I go ahead and do it for
> them? How is that dumb?
>
>> You're asking me to believe that you'd deliberately throw away
>> money over "web-morals" = nothing?
>
> No, read what I said. You have to both READ and UNDERSTAND what
> you read or your reply makes you sound really stupid.
>
....
>
> 1. Read the post.
> 2. Understand what you read.
> 3. Make your reply.
>
> (You seemed to have missed step 2)
>


I must just make a quick note to be a notch nicer to you Travis
in future as this is /a most sensible/ reply to our young
hothead here...

I don't suppose I could subcontract out to you when I have to
deal with such guys in future (honour demands some sort of
reckoning...). You show promise at it. What can I offer you in
return? No one seems that keen on my Polish collection (this one
is a bit bare, has only one member). You are likely not
interested in NZ ones? What about Texas ones or Israeli ones
(who does not like Israeli ones? Arabs maybe? I have some Arabic
ones...?). (psst... what about some nice wrist watches...?)

dorayme

[Back to original message]