|
Posted by dorayme on 10/23/05 01:02
> From: Andy Dingley <dingbat@codesmiths.com>
>
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 11:44:11 +1000, dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> So the output - the output, what the average punter sees and
>> uses on and from his screen - is awful, is it?
>
> Yes. Like all of these on-screen design tools (extending as far as
> Dreamweaver in some cases) it's based on DTP, not web design. There's
> only one "view" of a page (window size, screen resolution, font sizes)
> and although it might look perfectly adequate in that one context, it
> suffers badly for anything different.
>
You are doubtless right. I make a comment now not meant to
flatly contradict you. The situation may be worse than you
think!
To take just one point, I am back on my Mac and notice that it
breaks up horribly at different font sizes. This has nothing to
do with Dreamweaver much, it is really quite a naive or ignorant
use of it I would say... I would rather fall down a hole in the
ground and be pissed on by passing kangaroos than use any of
these alleged wysiwigs, but here I digress.
--
dorayme
[Back to original message]
|