Posted by Noozer on 10/24/05 13:28

"Jemdam.com" <noemail@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:5Jmdnas_BfTgMcHeRVnyhA@giganews.com...
>
>>
>>> http://www.pixelverts.com
>>
>> Seven hundred and fifty seven K of HTML? You must be kidding :-)
>>
>
> I know! Thaks for the feedback, I got it down to 200 on my offline
> version. It is the image map of 10000 squares which is the worst case for
> the page. I cannot think of any other way to make it less. If I used
> seperate graphics and HTML links I think it would be worse!
>
> Any ideas?

I think you need to rethink the design...

How about a table (or CSS layout) with 100 rows of 100 HTML links?

[Back to original message]