Posted by jeze on 10/26/05 00:26

JDS wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:00:43 +0200, Mitja Trampus wrote:
>
> > Hmmm... I'm not so sure. If, for instance, I replied to your
> > post with a hundred posts of "No it's not", I'd consider it
> > spam.
>
> true enough. I actually looked it up after the OP's rant and found that
> any large quantity of unwanted rubbish is generally considered spam, in
> most any context.
>
> --
> JDS | jeffrey@go.away.com
> | http://www.newtnotes.com
> DJMBS | http://newtnotes.com/doctor-jeff-master-brainsurgeon/


You are both right on the money. The content is 100% irrelevant.
Its the QUANTITY.

Doesn't matter if its on or off topic, offensive, for a good cause,
non-commercial, commercial, etc. No message in or of itself is SPAM.

The message "No it's not" repeated 100 tiems is a SPAM QUANTITY.

[Back to original message]