Posted by X l e c t r i c on 11/02/05 03:41

Sparticus wrote:

"I have been doing web development for a while now (as a hobby) but
there is one thing I never understood. It's about tables and pixels
widths.

For example,

1.) If I make a table at tell it to be 800 pixels wide, with border="1"
(which I don't think is 1 pixel... but just size 1) is the table
something like 796 pixels wide, ple 4 pixels for the border? Or 800
pixels wide, plus 4 pixels for the border? (a total of 804).

2.) If I do the same thing as question 1, but with no border, I assume
my table is in fact 800 pixels wide... so, can I toss in an 800 pixel
wide image and have it fit perfectly (none if it is clipped)?

3.) I normally always set my cellspacing and cellpadding to zero, but if
I don't, how does that affect the answers to the other questions?

I understand I'm asking allot... but it's always bothered me and I never
found any documentation to help me. if anyone can answer these questions
for me I'd be very grateful.

Thanx in advance!

Ryan Ritten"

Yes, as already pointed out the table should be 800 pixels wide (inner),
plus the border. Of course, if you simply want the table to conform to
the dimensions of the table content, then specifying a width isn't
necessary at all.

I've been under the impression that with html, border, cellpadding, and
cellspacing values are in pixels.

Wasn't there an older version of Navigator or Explorer that would add a
a value of 1 or 2 to cellpadding and/or cellspacing if a value of 0
wasn't specified ? At any rate, even if redundant, it might be a good
idea to specify values of 0 if that's what you want.

Later, Art.

[Back to original message]