Posted by Onideus Mad Hatter on 11/22/05 05:27

On 21 Nov 2005 15:39:24 -0800, "marika" <marika5000@gmail.com> wrote:

>> then whats up with the pic of "him" at his site?

>what I observed isn't a pic, but a drawing,
>it's not labelled in any way that would allow an attribution to the
>owner.

The original version was created by Affinity after I did one of
her...I modified it a bit though from her version (altered some of the
shading).

>> fatter cant be a woman . . woman have more style than a pissant like
>> it. can we settle on calling fatter "it?"

>I think that is a good selection.

It certainly is...you know, if you're a serial killer who needs to try
and dehumanize your victims...

>Because it seems to me that there is more than one person sockin that
>account, and has been for a while.

*snicker*

>There's at least two distinct
>personalities that I can pick out and they are opposite genders.

Sorry kiddo, but it's just me...although I do often use multiple
personas...I also use variable typing styles and employ a variety of
custom developed techniques designed to incur ambiguity, confusion,
hatred, depression, misdirection, etc. Stuff like Post Backbuilding
and Reverse Emotional Magnification Reflection (one of my most
damaging techniques).

>I think they are about the same age, but I can't be totally sure of that.

You're quite ill equiped to be making any ASSumptions in the area,
Kiddo. You have no experience whatsoever in net.psych.

>In any event, the website says it all.

Yeah...better than you.

>If that website were meant to garner clientele, there would be
>something on there a client might be interested besides pricing
>schemes.

You mean like the contact information? LOL

Coincidentally, when I want work...I just go get it. I find a project
I want to work on, make some mockups, send em to the owners and say,
"Hey, wanna buy this?" and more often than not they jump right on it
cause my prices are reasonable and my mockups make their existing
sites look like utter crap.

>Could there be a worse cover website than that.

....well there's always your site...and the sites of pretty much all
the other regs around these froups.

>It's full of anime references, but really, no product.

....two AMVs is "full of anime references", eh? LOL

>Now, whether I was corporate or small time, I wouldn't be pickin this
>entity to do any work for me.

There's a reason you're not either, Stupid...and it's because you
wouldn't pick someone like me. Yer just some pathetic nobody...and
that's all you'll ever be. ^_^

>Anime and a name like Onideus Mad Hatter? I think not. of BACKWATER
>productions? Again I think not.
>
>Not to mention, this net entity with a huge ego should be ANSWERIN
>questions, not asking them. Basic graphics stuff that should be
>apparent. And curiously, apparent to some of the alter egos sockin
>with the account

Your delusions sure are cute. It's all a vast Hatter conspiracy, huh?

>Now, as far as net legends go, a net legend shouldn't be askin such
>basics on a graphics newsgroup, but the only legendary thing I can tell
>it has done so far, is to be included in some of Lady Chatterly the
>post bots sig files.

I was the first person to immediately recognize Lady Chatterly as a
bot...basically showin off my skillz in net.psych.

>Wow what an accomplishment

I've done more in the realm of cutting edge graphic encoding and
implimentation than anyone, anywhere on Usenet.

>Which says just about one thing to me -- contract (possibly Lockheed)
>with a VERY low security clearance. Just enough to yell about sending
>bots after imagine enemies, but not enough power to sit down and shut
>up and save the world from terrorists.

ZOMG I'M NOT SAVING THE WORLD FROM TERRORISTS!1!!

>Dig?

Blank stars.

--

Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net

[Back to original message]