Posted by Thundercat Stevens on 11/24/05 18:07

Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote in
news:MPG.1def507e533b630a9896db@news.isp.com:

> With neither quill nor qualm, Thundercat Stevens quothed:
>
>> Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote in
>> news:MPG.1deee90f50d118229896d7@news.isp.com:
>>
>> > With neither quill nor qualm, Thundercat Stevens quothed:
>> >
>> >> And any other dumb site.
>> >>
>> >> Please don't force me to remember my user name AND email address.
>> >> If I am in your database, send my user name to my email address
>> >> when I request it.
>> >
>> > What's the difference between that and the user_name/pw
>> > combination?
>>
>> Erm, with one, I don't have to remember some obscure user name. After
>> about 50 sites, I tend to forget what flippant thing I typed in in
>> the first place.
>
> I agree with that and suffer the same problem, but still see no
> difference in forgetting an obscure user-name/pw set or a user-
> name/email set.

To clarify, all I should have to remember is my email address, which
doesn't ever change.


>> >> Your site, she is broken. Fix her.
>> >
>> > Most sites are broken, especially the high-ranking ones.
>>
>> Hell, all of my sites are crippled beyond belief.
>
> I don't know if you are joking or not, but I'll bet the most
> technically-correct and functional sites are not among the most
> popular on the whole.

Stupid standards! I have better things to do than get anal retentive
about technical details. It works in Firefox, good enough for me.


--
Thanks for Nothing, Amerikkka

http://www.bedoper.com

[Back to original message]