|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 11/28/05 07:58
With neither quill nor qualm, Onideus Mad Hatter quothed:
....
> >Duh, and it doesn't, as I claimed. Of course, it looks like you'll just
> >never be able to understand that.
>
> While your retarded lil fingers keep molesting your keyboard...it
> still works perfectly:
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/detect.html
Yeah?
> Now then, which major browser and OS combination does that not work
> with?
Mozilla - any applicable OS.
> >> >As I said before, even if you accept browser-sniffing as a tactic of
> >> >value,
>
> >> Are you claiming there's ANOTHER way of detecting whether a browser
> >> can handle the various aspects of PNG files? Oh, please, oh great
> >> master of the stupid, tell us all what it is!
I wasn't claiming anything with that particular phrase.
> >You ask me a question, assume the answer, then attach another question
> >onto the arbitrary choice you've made. You're a real beauty...
>
> That's a lovely sidestep, but you still didn't answer the question,
> here, let me post it again, for the benefit of your stupidity:
>
> Are you claiming there's ANOTHER way of detecting whether a browser
> can handle the various aspects of PNG files? Oh, please, oh great
> master of the stupid, tell us all what it is!
You vacillate between issues easily, don't you?
> >> >that script simply doesn't do what you claimed it did.
> >>
> >> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/detect.html
> >>
> >> Oh no? Seems to detect FF just fine, Downs.
>
> >So? Did I ever say it didn't. I said it didn't detect Mozilla in spite
> >of your feeble attempt to "adjust" the issue.
> Mozilla is a major browser now, is it?
Duh, yeah...
> Tell me, Stupid, why does the
> script need to detect Mozilla? See that's the big part you dribbling
> little idiots keep skipping...the whole POINT of your rambling,
> incoherent stupidity. Oh...I guess rambling, incoherent stupidity
> *IS* the point of your reply, huh?
Really bad debate form there, Oni. You'd flunk it in high school.
> I'll tell you what, Downs, you tell me WHY, specifically, you need the
> script to be able to detect the now DEFUNCT Mozilla browser and I'll
> revise the script to include it. How's that, huh? You prove to
> everyone that you're not just a stupid fucking MORON and I'll give you
> a lil gift. ^_^
Defunct?? Oh, I see: you declared Mozilla defunct so it is now defunct.
<snicker>
> >> >Furthermore, you sound like a child in the process of being raised
> >> >improperly. Everyone has an ego, yes, but everyone makes mistakes, too.
> >>
> >> Yes, yes they do...but then I can correct them:
> >> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/detect.html
> >>
> >> You weren't arguing against my work originally, Stupid, you were
> >> arguing against someone elses. Doesn't work so well when I'm the one
> >> whose rewritten it, neh?
> >
> >Who cares whose work it is? This isn't a personal attack on the author,
> >it's a statement that the script is sub-par.
>
> The script won't wipe your ass for you either, Stupid, but that
> doesn't make it sub-par.
It's lousy. It's sub-par. It doesn't do the job it's supposed to do.
Maybe it did originally and you screwed it up or maybe it never did, but
right now it stinks.
> You are right about one thing though..it's
> not a personal attack on the author, it's a FAILING effort to try and
> attack me. What's the matter, did that mean 'ol Mad Hatter fuck up
> your day or something?
This started out being about an inferior script; now it's about you. In
fact most of your dialogues sooner or later end up being about you,
don't they? Inferior complex? Need the old ego bolstered now 'n agin
with some "scintillating invective"? Very childish, Oni.
> >> >Own up to it, Onideus: you ain't as good as it gets by a long shot.
>
> >> Oh no? Well then you should be able to tell me of a site that has
> >> fading text effects like this one:
> >> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_test_platform/cbstory/
>
> >This is your idea of "as good as it gets?"
>
> I see you're unable to find a site that has that effect...oh, hey,
> looks it's me...not surprised.
What effect, as good as it gets? What _are_ you talking about, anyway?
> >> You should also be able to tell me of a site that employs a perfect
> >> liquid image structure using multiple images:
> >> http://www.backwater-productions.net/alt.2600/
>
> >And this is your idea of "as good as it gets?"
>
> Is that your idea of telling me of a site that employs a perfect
> liquid image structure using multiple images...cause uh, your
> retardation of the English language doesn't look much like a
> hyperlink, Trainable.
Why should I tell you that? In all honesty, though, it would be hard to
find another web site quite like yours.
> >> I'm as good as it gets, Kiddo...in a lot of areas.
>
> >I doubt that.
>
> ...well then where are your links, Stupid?
>
> >As they say, "There's always someone better."
> >Furthermore, the evidence you offer for your claim is especially
> >dubious.
>
> ...well then where are the links, Stupid?
What links? Are you saying that you expect me to go search for some
shit that is less shittier than your shit in an attempt to prove your
shit is worse shit and not better shit than the other shit? Shit...
> >> Oh but hey, do
> >> feel free to attempt to prove me wrong.
>
> >Why should I?
>
> ...to avoid looking like a stupid, moronic, fucking retard?
>
> >You going to pay me?
>
> It's yer ego on the line, Kiddo, not mine...like I said, I've got the
> sites, I've got the work...you don't have shit. There are only two
> kinds of people online...those who produce...and those who run at the
> fuckin mouth...guess which one you are!
Say what, my ego is "on the line" pursuant to _this_ conversation?? You
must be mad, Hatter!
> >> And, you know, when you
> >> backpedal,
>
> >Yeah, lots of people who converse with you backpedal, don't they?
>
> Only the ones who talk shit with nothing to back it up like you.
> Again, WHERE ARE YOUR LINKS?
I ate them for breakfast.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
[Back to original message]
|