Posted by Alan Baker on 12/06/05 22:01

In article <6ekap11dbqp7f9sptdsb9tijt7mvg2br9o@4ax.com>,
Onideus Mad Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:46:44 GMT, "Elizabeth" <elizabeth@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> Apparently Oldami is the kind of dumbass who thinks you can resize a
> >> raster image to any size and it'll retain the same quality.
>
> Here let me add some space between the two SEPERATE thoughts, maybe
> you'll be less confused that way.
>
> >> Free
> >> cl00, kiddie, even if you up yer res, it's still 72 pixels per inch,
> >> altering the res essentially just changes the size of the pixels, but
> >> it's STILL 72, you fucking moron. What, do you think your computer
> >> can just MAKE UP pixels that don't exist? LOL
>
> >Your *computer* can't do much of anything. But your computer, running
> >Photoshop, most certainly CAN, and DOES, "make up pixels that don't exist."
> >Just what is it you think is happening when you "upsize" an image ?
>
> ...you're talking about RESIZING an image, that last section is
> talking about CHANGING THE RESOLUTION of an image.
>
> *shakes head*
>
> Jesus you kids are slow.

Read carefully:

Images don't *have* a resolution. Images are so many dots high by so
many dots wide. Any "resolution" listed for them is a *suggestion*, not
an inherent part of the image.

A lot of people have tried to explain this to you, now try and learn
something for once.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling 4 feet, move the fireplace from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect
if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard."

[Back to original message]