Reply to Re: [PHP] Re: Get name of extending class with static method call

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by Morten Rψnseth on 11/10/33 11:05

Jochem Maas wrote:
> Mehdi Achour wrote:
>
>> Because it's a change, that should be reverted, or documented.
>
>
> don't top post - its bad form and many people ignore topposts.
> Mehdi is right to say that debug_backtrace() has changed - but so has
> the whole engine - I don't think that function was ever meant to be used
> in the way Morten was (or was it Torsten?). its clearly for debugging, no?

Ah - but I was only checking out a previous tip on the subject. I wasn't
actually trying to implement a fix using debug_backtrace().
Good heavens, no! It would be far to ineffective.


> and yeah, everything should be documented - but are you going to do? :-)
>
>>
>> didou
>>
>
> ...
>
>>>
>>> why do you think they'd respond with something else than "ask at
>>> php.generals" ?
>
>
> bogus! - this is not a case of someone not knowing/understanding
> existing functionality. its a case of him missing something which quite
> a few people think should be available to PHP users, ofcourse the
> developers are entitled to disagree. actually I read php-dev like a
> zealot (brilliant way to learn about php) and I see the chap in question
> has posted his question and already got one answer... which didn't
> mention php-general at all ;-)
>
>>
>>

[Back to original message]


УдалСнная Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π° для программистов  •  Как Π·Π°Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π° Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  ΡΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΠΈ Π½Π° английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Π‘Π°ΠΉΡ‚ ΠΈΠ·Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ Π² Π‘Ρ‚ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΠΈ Π’Π°Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠŸΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΡƒΡ‡Π΅ΠΊΠ°
ΠΈΠ·Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠΊΠ° Π²Π΅Π±-сайтов, Ρ€Π°Π·Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ обСспСчСния, поисковая оптимизация