|
Posted by Stan McCann on 01/08/06 21:32
Gιrard Talbot <newsblahgroup@gtalbot.org> wrote in
news:42d6fbF1hbrenU1@uni-berlin.de:
> Malte Christensen wrote :
>> Bernhard Sturm wrote:
>>
>>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>>
>>> this is a perfect example to demonstrate that valid HTML (the page
>>> we are discussing here validates as 'valid HTML 4.01'!) does not
>>> mean that the page is semantically valid. The source code above is
>>> not structured and semantically questionable if not completely
>>> wrong.
This is something that I warn my students about, especially the older
folk as we grew up in a paper world and it can be very difficult to
achieve proper seperation for us.
This isn't an excuse, just a warning that us older folk must be more
conscious of our tendencies. The younger people that have grown up
with the computer screen medium better understand it's flexibility
making it a bit easier to look at something and immediately think of it
as what it is rather than how it looks.
>> Constructive criticism always welcome. My mail address is on the
>> site.
>
> http://www.gtalbot.org/NvuSection/NvuWebDesignTips/WebDesignResources
> .html#CSSWebpageTemplates
Nice work Gιrard. I'll share that link with my students if you don't
mind.
--
Stan McCann "Uncle Pirate" http://stanmccann.us/pirate.html
Webmaster/Computer Center Manager, NMSU at Alamogordo
http://alamo.nmsu.edu/ There are 10 kinds of people.
Those that understand binary and those that don't.
[Back to original message]
|