Posted by dorayme on 01/25/06 08:41

In article
<43d6fce5$0$18613$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
Mark Parnell <webmaster@clarkecomputers.com.au> wrote:

> Deciding to do something for the good of humanity, dorayme
> <doraymebutuse777insubjectline@optusnet.com.au> declared in alt.html:
>
> > Mark, can you please sort this one out. Look at the posts
> > concerned and judge the situation. And tell me and Blinky what
> > you find.
>
> You're both right. :-)
>


Thank you for looking at it. And everything, Mark old son. But I
think the situation is worse than you make out. Personally I
don't mind lewd attributions even if they are false. But there
has been a development: I have had the local Catholic priest, the
Anglican rector and the Rabbi knock on my door complaining
furiously and searching my house for magazines.

I tried to explain to them and showed them the posts on my
screen. They screamed at me that the posts showed clearly I had
said what seemed to be attributed to me. I said what news client
did they use but they brushed such things aside as attempts to
distract them with science.

You have put me in a very awkward position Blinky!

See how bad it looks when you actually face the reality at
http://dorayme.150m.com/test/blinky.html

I sidetracked these religious leaders by telling them the one
about about the three friends, a Catholic priest, an Anglican
rector and a Rabbi...

They rolled out in paroxysms of laughter and forgot about it, (I
noticed that the Rabbi had a few of my Chess magazines in his
mits. He plays, you see! But I think it was just an oversight!)
Anyway, they were headed to the pub but I think I will give the
local a miss for tonight just in case....

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]