Posted by dorayme on 01/25/06 11:03

In article
<pan.2006.01.25.07.36.42.703326@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
Blinky the Shark <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:10:37 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <pan.2006.01.25.06.12.29.21860@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
> > Blinky the Shark <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >>The attribution *to nothing* was sloppy but only confusing to > someone
> >>who doesn't understand attribution in general. So far, that seems to
> >>belimted to dorayme.
>
> And should I complain about your quoting, there? After all, I didn't
> write it that way, with gt's scattered all throughout the paragraph. You
> are misrepresenting that, by showing them that way when they were
> originally on the left margin where they belong.
>

You have lost me?

Your posts look to me exactly like the png I sent a while back in
the link, gt signs or alternative lines at left Nothing is
particularly scattered?

There seems to be some significant difference between how you are
viewing them and how I am viewing? Is there some wrapping
problem?

In what I see above there is a ">" between "confusing to" and
"someone". This is a scattered ">". It appears in all my
newsreaders and it appeared before this reply.

I even looked at your posts in that web based Google thing and no
surprises at my end. That little scattered ">" I mention above is
also there scattered. You saying you did not put that 'lil 'ol
thing there? Who did? A toon maybe? All others were on the left?

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]