Posted by Blinky the Shark on 01/25/06 12:16

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:03:01 +1100, dorayme wrote:

> In article
> <pan.2006.01.25.07.36.42.703326@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
> Blinky the Shark <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:10:37 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>>
>> > In article
>> > <pan.2006.01.25.06.12.29.21860@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
>> > Blinky the Shark <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote:
>> >
>> >>The attribution *to nothing* was sloppy but only confusing to >
>> >>someone who doesn't understand attribution in general. So far, that
>> >>seems to belimted to dorayme.
>>
>> And should I complain about your quoting, there? After all, I didn't
>> write it that way, with gt's scattered all throughout the paragraph.
>> You are misrepresenting that, by showing them that way when they were
>> originally on the left margin where they belong.
>>
>>
> You have lost me?

Why would you ask me that? How would I know?

> Your posts look to me exactly like the png I sent a while back in the
> link, gt signs or alternative lines at left Nothing is particularly
> scattered?

You seem to have cleaned them up, up there. Only one remains. That's not
good, presenting as a quote something you've doctored. It's no longer a
quote, then.

> There seems to be some significant difference between how you are
> viewing them and how I am viewing? Is there some wrapping problem?

At your end, yes.

> In what I see above there is a ">" between "confusing to" and "someone".
> This is a scattered ">". It appears in all my newsreaders and it
> appeared before this reply.

Yes, it started appearing with one of your earlier replies.

> I even looked at your posts in that web based Google thing and no
> surprises at my end. That little scattered ">" I mention above is also
> there scattered. You saying you did not put that 'lil 'ol thing there?
> Who did? A toon maybe? All others were on the left?

No, they weren't. Something on your end did.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
Details: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html

[Back to original message]