Posted by Andy Dingley on 02/18/06 19:23

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 15:27:09 +0100, "Julien CROUZET"
<julien.crouzet@/enlever ca\theoconcept.com> wrote:

>That's true for a big, full AJAX based application, but I'm not sure
>that using a > 200ko framework for such a tiny application is such a
>good idea.

What's a "framework" ? AJAX is _not_ a "framework", in the sense that
the term is normally used in the heavyweight Java world. You might well
have a point that such frameworks are inappropriate for simple apps, but
that's not what AJAX is advocating anyway.

Secondly, bad code is bad code. Doing it wrongly in a small app is no
more excusable than doing it wrongly in a large app. The two axes are
unrelated.

[Back to original message]