Posted by Neil on 10/14/05 21:45

That's interesting, since I've heard so much about 2002 and 2003 not being
that much different than 2000 and not worth the upgrade. Thanks for the
note.

"Steve Jorgensen" <nospam@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:hsgvk1h6r98j4gqq8n3ardte70dqfli7lb@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:11:41 GMT, "Neil" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>I am using SQL 7 with an MS Access 2000 MDB front end, using bound forms
>>with ODBC linked tables. In one form, the user needs to be able to check a
>>box to select one or more records. This is accomplished with a local table
>>containing two fields: the primary key value of the SQL table and a
>>boolean
>>field used for the check box.
>
> By the way - if you can ditch Access 2000 for 2002 or 2003 - do it now.
> Access 2000 has far more bugs and quirks with ODBC usage that can waste
> your
> time and get you into trouble.

[Back to original message]