Posted by Stu on 10/25/05 18:34

Better in terms of what?

I mean, there are risks with using sp_executesql, and you've already
made the decision to split your data (thus minimizing contamination
and/or infiltration) so it seems a bit odd to allow users to jump into
a common database (but there are ways to do this without
sp_executeSQL)...

What's your criteria for defining "better"?

Stu

[Back to original message]