Posted by meltedown on 11/15/05 21:37

Bob Bedford wrote:
>
>
> "Geoff Berrow" <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> a écrit dans le message de news:
> ki0en1p24522276b2drnoe11iu2emkgujh@4ax.com...
>
>>Message-ID: <ehtdn1lph2c5hngfhhrtr86cp799f2ncbf@4ax.com> from Tim
>>Roberts contained the following:
>>
>>
>>>They cannot invent query
>>>strings, they only follow the links on existing pages, but they will
>>>certainly follow links with query strings attached.
>>
>>Most pundits seem to say that search engines will not follow query
>>strings (e.g. http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol2/search_no11.htm )
>>
>>Do you have definitive information on this?
>
> as already stated previously:
> www.mysite.com&cat=23&id=34
>
> has far less importance for google and others than
>
> www.mysite.com/television/sony
>
> when you look at sony television....
>
> I've already a page with all links that spriders may follow, but they have
> no informations on the URL of what kind of object the page is referenced. Of
> course there is a title for it, but with the main text on the URL that I
> want to taget for search engine users, then the page will win on pagerank.
>
> Bob

Are saying the second url is better because it has the words
"television" and "sony" in it ?

So wouldn't www.mysite.com/index.php?&cat=telvision&id=sony
be just as good ?


>
>
>
>

[Back to original message]