Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 12/26/05 17:05

Tony Marston wrote:
> "Anonymous" <anonymous@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
> news:43AE8ECF.54D24C7C@nowhere.invalid...
>
>>Tony Marston wrote:
>>
>>>Case-sensitivity is the whole point of this thread. Any language that has
>>>a
>>>feature which can be abused and which produces unmaintainable code is a
>>>BAD
>>>language. Any language that allows the same variable or function name to
>>
>>Then any language is bad by your definition.
>
>
> Any language that allows stupid mistakes is a bad language. That's why some
> programmers say that statically-typed and compiled languages are better that
> dynamically-typed interpretted languages.
>
>
>>That's not true. Anyone proficient in german can assure you that "Helft
>>den armen Vögeln." and "Helft den Armen vögeln." means something
>>*completely* different! ;-)
>
>
> Trust the bloody square-head sausage-eaters to throw a spanner in the works.
> But in ENGLISH, which is the universal language, there is no difference.
> Just check out any dictionary. Does it have separate entries in each case?
> No? I wonder why.....
>
>

Gee, another American who thinks he's the center of the universe...


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[Back to original message]