| 
 Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 01/01/06 00:19 
Colin Fine wrote: 
> Jerry Stuckle wrote: 
>  
>> Tony Marston wrote: 
>> 
>>> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message  
>>> news:LYmdnewR-c7gxzDenZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@comcast.com... 
>>> 
>>>> It really doesn't matter if you agree or not.  The fact is the vast  
>>>> majority of programmers in this world disagree with you. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Are you saying that the vast majority of programmers would agree with  
>>> a language that allowed the same variable or function name to exist  
>>> in different mixtures of upper and lower case, and for each  
>>> combination of case to have a different meaning? That would make it  
>>> far easier to write unmaintainable code. Would that be a good or a  
>>> bad thing? 
>>> 
>> 
>> They would agree with a languages that allows the same variable or  
>> function name to exist in different mixtures of case.  After all, 'a'  
>> is NOT the same character as 'A'. 
>> 
> True. But 'a' is the same WORD as 'A'. And most variable names are (or  
> are made of) words. 
>  
> Colin 
 
Not in C, C++, Java, etc. they aren't.  And we're talking COMPUTER  
languages here - not HUMAN languages.  Or can't you figure out the  
difference? 
 
--  
================== 
Remove the "x" from my email address 
Jerry Stuckle 
JDS Computer Training Corp. 
jstucklex@attglobal.net 
==================
 
[Back to original message] 
 |