Posted by Neredbojias on 02/25/06 08:06

With neither quill nor qualm, Richard Sexton quothed:

> In article <MPG.1e68fb07b98d0f999897de@news.isp.com>,
> Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
> >With neither quill nor qualm, Travis Newbury quothed:
> >
> >> Bob wrote:
> >> > Travis.....thanks for taking the time to respond and thanks for the
> >> > good advice.
> >> > Can I take a quick look at some of your websites?
> >>
> >> I don't make websites. I create Flash based e-learning and webcast
> >> development tools.
> >
> >Interesting. Are you anti-establishment or is this just some peculiar
> >Travisty of yours?
>
> I have a frie^H^H^H^H guy I know that does "content rich multimedia
> presentations". They only work in IE and absolutley require javascript.
>
> He is rich beyond belief.

There may or may not be a connection. Perhaps he simply has unusual
sales ability. Or a proclivity for rectae. Furthermore, the real
question is: Can it be done again?

> How do you think Gutenberg would have felt if he saw a copy of Hustler?

Horny, what else?

> Now you know. Poeple pay for this shit and pay big.

-Because they think it makes them more money than they pay. Is that a
premise with which you agree unilaterally?

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]