Posted by Blinky the Shark on 12/11/76 11:41

Leonard Blaisdell wrote:

> In article <pan.2006.03.04.04.18.39.375310@thurston.blinkynet.net>,
> Blinky the Shark <no.spam@box.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I could swear that this afternoon I was only getting the three other
>> errors from a page or two that had the in-paragraph DOCTYPE declaration.
>> Looking at his doc root index.htm page, now, the DOCTYPE *is* at the top
>> of the page (I was sure that was one with the imbedded declaration).
>> Methinks it's moved. :) At any rate, thanks for the input.
>
> The index file was properly fixed before I searched. These results are

Ah HAH! :)

> interesting too.

> <http://www.htmlhelp.com/cgi-bin/validate.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.johndo
> uglas.demon.co.uk%2F&warnings=yes&spider=yes> I hope Mr. Douglas is

Yikes -- there are those DOCTYPEs in <p>s.

> reading this. My simple critique wasn't really for Blinky.

<not reading it. retroactively> ;)


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Coming Soon: Filter rules specific to various real news clients

[Back to original message]