|
Posted by Nik Coughlin on 11/15/57 11:41
Nicolo Nyo Armato wrote:
> Nik Coughlin ha scritto:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would really like a critique of the site that I am working on at
>> the moment. It is nearly done, though you may find a couple of
>> pages with no real content.
>>
>> http://nrkn.com/fm/
>> http://nrkn.com/fm/fm.css
>
> Haiii! Haiiiiiii!!! Chottooooo!!! >_<
>
> I do not really know the target level of the company and your level in
> web production but:
I'm a software developer, the web stuff is a side thing.
> - General visual guidelines are very far, close to Mars, clean but
> very amateurish IMHO.
I don't understand. What do you mean by "guidelines are very far, close to
Mars"?
> - Brand Logo on Venus as well, logo restyling is required IMHO
Someone else did the logo. Don't understand the "on Venus" reference though
:)
> - Colors are quite good and quite bad at the same time, there are too
> much colour and no really good connection between them. MULTI-IMHO
> - I didn't any w3c check but ppls around said ok, so code is valid at
> least :) It's a good start ;D W3C-IMHO
>
> It's a very good work for amateur, acceptable-looking for novice
> professional design, bad for skilled professional, "impossible to say"
> for highly skilled award winning professional , make your choice :)
>
Thanks for you comments, do you think you could show me a couple of examples
of what are in your opinion professional pages?
[Back to original message]
|