Posted by Bart on 10/01/07 11:42

"RickW" <user=wannall at=@ other=sbcglobal final=.net> wrote in message
news:o_7Pf.71$TQ2.7262@news.uswest.net...
> Ignoring the rude, ego-inflated hot air that blasts off the page, I
> reply with a few details.
>
>
> Let me think...Wouldn't I love to hire someone who loves to insult
> people, who writes like an angry teenager, and who overrates his own

Damn that's funny. Joe didn't even take out the big guns to insult you and
you are crying. Generally speaking, if you want to ask an SQL question,
listen to Joe. If you want to feel good about yourself, ask some else
offline. Joe and a few others have been INCREDIBLY helpful in finding SQL
solutions. Just check your ego at the door. Besides, Joe is a teddy bear
if you meet him in person and pretty funny if you get him drunk.


> understanding and abilities with every pronouncement? And who wraps
> exactly one informative sentence ("a VIEW is a table and **by
> definition** has no ordering") in 10 ranting insults? Hmmmm. Tough
> call.
>
> Come to think of it, I'm curious: Why exactly did you bother to reply?
> Did you accomplish what you intended? What exactly was that?
>
>
>
>
> Science is organized common sense where many a beautiful theory was
> killed by an ugly fact. -- Thomas Huxley
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***

[Back to original message]