Posted by Neredbojias on 03/18/06 11:42

With neither quill nor qualm, Onideus Mad Hatter quothed:

> On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 02:10:53 -0700, Neredbojias
> <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
>
> >With neither quill nor qualm, Connie Pierce quothed:
> >
> >> In article <MPG.1e85035f5d750a0d98981f@news.isp.com>, Neredbojias
> >> <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > With neither quill nor qualm, Connie Pierce quothed:
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks for the entertainment! ( :
> >> >
> >> > Yeah...
> >> >
> >> > Just for the record, the errors in your sig do little to instill
> >> > confidence in potential clients.
> >>
> >> I know of one error (my "coming soon" - but AFAIK, there are no others
> >> . . . ). As to the one error, I've only used it here and haven't had
> >> time to redesign and get it online . . .
> >>
> >> But FTR, clients don't see my sig.
> >
> >Potential clients do.
>
> D00d, are you slow in a...special kind of way? Who goes on Usenet
> LOOKING for clients? ...well, besides that Muggzy retard anyway.
> *snicker*
>
> I think most of us "with it" designers have enough class and self
> fucking respect that we don't need to go running around spamming
> Usenet looking for dregs.

Get real. What entrepreneur ignores a potential source of business?

> >The other error is "principal/designer" unless you are concurrently the
> >head of a school and a creative fashioner of some kind or other.
>
> Hey Nere, can you copy edit all my sites next? I'm not going to pay
> you or anything, but afterwards your mom can make you some chocolate
> milk and you can run around Usenet wearing your Pullups and shouting
> out what a "big kid" you are. ^_^

The evidence strongly suggests that any such endeavor would be quite
futile.

--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.

[Back to original message]