|
Posted by dorayme on 03/25/06 02:40
In article <MPG.1e8d23234a69c92d98984c@news.isp.com>,
Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
> With neither quill nor qualm, dorayme quothed:
>
> > In article <MPG.1e8c1d2a346bfeef989846@news.isp.com>,
> > Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Do you know what "schmuck" really means?
> > > >
> > > > No, I have no idea? Do you know what it means to say to someone
> > > > in a semi-friendly (Australian sort of) way that they are a poor
> > > > schmuck?
> > >
> > > Actually, I've never done that, but I have discovered that semi-friendly
> > > gestures can often be misinterpreted as semi-inimical.
> >
> > er... well, why is this a misinterpretation?
> >
> > Look, seriously, I have no particular desire to offend you Boji,
> > you have never done me any harm, forget about it if you can't
> > quite understand the rough and bollocking spirit in which it is
> > said...
>
> Seriously, I fence on a higher plain. <big wide grin>
> (I used to bollock more often but it drained me of vital fluids.)
>
> > Shake hands with Blinky, he is my handshaking agent from now on...
>
> No thanks, who knows where it's been? ...
Ah Boji, maybe you are not such a shmuck after all!
--
dorayme
[Back to original message]
|