Posted by Herb Caudill on 03/25/06 00:21

>> You've taken the feature and tied your own definition to it. That
usually comes back and bite you one day. <<<

OK, OK, OK. Got it. Point is it used to work that way and all of us
stupid schlubs who failed to read the fine print took advantage of the
way it worked in practice.

I'm trying to arrive at some sort of best practice now.

>>> Maybe you should look into the row_number function <<<

Thanks - I'll look into this. At first glance, it seems like a very
complicated solution to (what used to be) a very simple problem.

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***

[Back to original message]