Posted by B on 03/31/06 17:59

Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2006 08:30:37 -0800, "B" <b00010001@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Oh I'm quite certain you're scared shitless every time you even see
> >> one of my posts, cause ya KNOW yer gonna get yer ass blistered. Now
> >> go and get me the belt and get on over my knee, it's time for yer
> >> spankin again.
>
> >No, the only thing I'm afraid of is your blatantly homosexual
> >tendancies. I'm exit only, and yet you keep wanting to comment on my
> >butt.
>
> So you're afraid that you might be gay, huh?
>

Not quite, little guy. I'm afraid you're gay, and you obviously have
memory retention problems.

> >> >BTW, XML would allow you to use your calendar crap with multiple
> >> >systems and be ignorant of platform and language.
>
> >> ...except that it already can do that. Duh uh, Flash is teh HARD, yo!
> >> LOL
>
> >Oh, I didn't realize that when you ask a question as to, "What can I do
> >with it?", you've already written all the XML interface routines that
> >you'll need to actually have it process information cross-platform.
> >Oh, that's right - you didn't, mm wrote the routines to handle XML, but
> >not the code to work with your specific piece of crap.
>
> Oh boy, you're babbling incoherently again. Look, Kiddo, the Wedding
> Blog site was made in Flash, any system that has the Flash plugin on
> it can use it...fuckin DUH! And, no, sorry, it doesn't have fuck all
> to do with XML.
>

Yes it does. You're such a retard, lil' hatter. You're talking about
flash to flash. I'm talking flash to app 'j' in a n-tier distributed
network. Are you encoding your flash calls in asn now? No, cause that
would stupid to do when XML is widely available. You're calendar is
hardly an rt critical app.

In your case, your progam works fine because you cannot think outside
of the box. You try and scale your app... and BLOOP... your done.

> Now then, let's see you get all pissy and indignant about it and
> threaten to contact my clients and whine about me again...cause, ya
> know, THAT is funny. ^_^
>
> >So, what you're saying is you don't have a clue what you've written.
> >Your a hacker who's trying to code and apparently living with your mom.
>
> I live with my mom, huh? WOW, boy THAT sure is original. Yeesh, do
> code like you lame? Sloppy and redundant? LOL
>
> >> You would need to go to school to learn how to be an ignorant dribbler
> >> who makes ASSumptions about technology you've never even dealt with,
> >> huh? Yeah...I guess I can buy that.
>
> >HA HA HA HA... This coming from you? HA HA HA.
>
> This coming from the fuckin doorknob who thinks XML is like the second
> coming of Keerist.
>

Actually, this is from someone who has designed and worked on large
commercial systems. XML isn't the end all. There are more efficient
ways to perform inter-sys communication, but those are only reasonable
when your talking critical applications or where bandwidth and
efficiency are priorities.

> >> >- or at least have a critically thinking mind of more than a four year old.
>
> >> Boy now THAT certainly was an abortion of a comeback. Way too wordy
> >> and yer delivery was sloppier than yer mom's cunt after a jizz job.
>
> >It's ok lil' hatter. When I and my peers
>
> Oh boy, he's retarding back into the sheeple mentality already. You
> certainly didn't last long, didja Kiddo?
>
> >are writing the OS's that your little php and flash apps run off, I'll
> >be sure to think of lil' hatter and his 'oh so complex' php/flash
> >integration.
>
> You're "writing" operating systems now, huh Bumbles?
>

Yes, actually - embedded systems software, small micro-kernel os, etc.

> LOL...I think maybe you meant to say "coding". ^_^
>
> If there's even a shred of truth to your stupidity (which I doubt),
> then you must be coding for like Microsoft...I mean what with how XML
> documents are usually more verbose than alternative binary formats.
> They use more bandwidth and storage space or require more processing
> power for compression. XML parsing is also usually slower than
> parsing highly optimized binary formats and can require more
> memory...oh yeah, boy, gotta love that XML!
>
> *snicker*
>
> You fuckin fruitloop.
>

Actually, lil' hatter, if your mental capacity was greater, you'd
understand that many applications use XML in distributed systems.
You'd have to be severely mentally defficient to exclude XML from the
design equation when 1) it exists and 2) it's easy and quickly
understood. Is it optimal? No. But there are design decisions you
learn to make when you have an education. These decisions may be
better for the business case and fundementally easier and equally
efficient - it's called critical thinking.

B

[Back to original message]